Development, Technology, Updates

Git Flow vs Trunk-Based for CI/CD

Explore the differences between Git Flow and Trunk-Based Development for effective CI/CD workflows, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.

Git Flow vs Trunk-Based for CI/CD

Choosing between Git Flow and Trunk-Based Development (TBD) can significantly impact your CI/CD workflow. Here’s a quick breakdown:

  • Git Flow: Best for structured, version-controlled environments. It uses multiple branches like main, develop, feature, release, and hotfix. Ideal for large teams, slower release cycles, and strict QA processes.
  • Trunk-Based Development: Focuses on a single main branch with short-lived feature branches. Suited for smaller teams, fast-paced releases, and strong automated testing.

Quick Comparison:

AspectGit FlowTrunk-Based Development
Branch ComplexityMultiple long-lived branchesSingle branch, short-lived branches
Release CadenceScheduled releasesContinuous deployment
Team SizeLarge teamsSmall to medium teams
TestingEnd-of-cycle testingAutomated testing
Deployment RiskLower with staged releasesHigher with frequent updates
RollbackSlowerFaster

Key takeaway: Use Git Flow for structured, slower workflows and TBD for speed and flexibility. Both require solid CI/CD pipelines to succeed.

29 - GitFlow vs. Trunk-Based Development: Managing …

Git Flow Workflow Basics

Git Flow

Git Flow organizes development using five branch types: main, develop, feature, release, and hotfix. This structure helps manage releases and parallel development effectively.

Git Flow Branch Structure

Branch TypePurposeMerge Target
MainHolds production-ready codeN/A
DevelopIntegrates features; serves as the base for feature branchesN/A
FeatureUsed for building individual features; created from developdevelop
ReleasePrepares for final testing and versioning; created from developmain & develop
HotfixFixes production issues quickly; created from mainmain & develop

Git Flow Advantages

  • Allows multiple features to be developed at the same time without causing conflicts.
  • Release branches provide a dedicated space for final testing and version preparation, keeping the develop branch open for ongoing work.
  • Hotfix branches make it easy to address production issues quickly without interrupting other development tasks.

Git Flow Drawbacks

  • Branch Management Complexity: Managing several active branches can make merging more challenging.
  • Slower Deployment: The formal release process may slow down deployments compared to simpler workflows.
  • Increased Maintenance: Each branch requires its own pipeline configuration, adding to the maintenance workload.

This workflow works best for projects that need strict version control, multiple release tracks, or compliance with regulations. Up next, we’ll explore how this compares to the streamlined approach of trunk-based development.

Trunk-Based Development Basics

Trunk-Based Development (TBD) revolves around a single main branch, often called the trunk or main. This approach aligns closely with DevOps practices and continuous integration.

Trunk-Based Branch Structure

In a typical TBD workflow, you’ll encounter these branch types:

Branch TypePurposeLifespan
Main/TrunkCentral branch with production-ready codePermanent
Feature BranchesTemporary branches for individual changesShort-lived
Release BranchesUsed for final tweaks before a releaseTemporary

Developers regularly merge small, incremental changes into the main branch - often multiple times a day. This encourages continuous testing and helps resolve conflicts quickly.

Trunk-Based Benefits

TBD brings several advantages for teams working with CI/CD and DevOps:

  • Fewer Merge Conflicts: Regular merges keep conflicts manageable.
  • Quicker Feedback: Automated builds run with every merge, catching bugs early.
  • Simpler Pipelines: A single branch reduces the complexity of CI/CD setups.
  • Better Team Collaboration: A shared trunk ensures everyone stays aligned.

This structure creates a streamlined workflow, setting the stage for a comparison with Git Flow in the next section.

Trunk-Based Limitations

While TBD has its strengths, it also comes with challenges that teams need to address:

ChallengeImpactHow to Address
Code StabilityRisk of breaking changes affecting mainUse strong automated testing
Team CoordinationOverlapping work can cause disruptionsRely on feature flags and frequent, small commits
Learning CurveTransitioning from long-lived branchesOffer training and phase in gradually
Scaling IssuesFrequent merges can overwhelm large teamsEnforce thorough code reviews

Adopting TBD successfully requires solid automated testing and open communication within the team.

Git Flow vs. Trunk-Based: Direct Comparison

Here’s how Git Flow and Trunk-Based Development stack up in key areas:

Feature Comparison Table

AspectGit FlowTrunk-Based Development
Branch ComplexityMultiple long-lived branchesSingle main branch with short-lived branches
Release CadenceScheduled releasesContinuous deployment
Team SizeWorks well for larger teamsBetter suited for smaller teams
Code Review ProcessFormal reviews during branch mergesOngoing review of small, frequent changes
Testing RequirementsFocus on end-of-cycle testingHeavy reliance on automated testing
Learning CurveMore complex due to multiple branchesSimpler workflow, but requires strong testing
Deployment RiskLower risk with staged releasesHigher risk with frequent updates
Recovery TimeSlower rollback processesFaster reversion capabilities

When to Use Each Workflow

Git Flow is ideal for enterprise-level projects that require structured, versioned releases. It’s a good fit for teams managing multiple supported versions and projects with formal QA or compliance needs.

Trunk-Based Development works best for teams and projects that prioritize speed and flexibility, such as:

  • SaaS platforms needing rapid updates
  • Teams with strong CI/CD pipelines
  • Projects backed by reliable automated testing
  • Continuous deployment workflows or frequent releases
  • Mobile app projects requiring regular updates

Some teams even combine the two methods: using Trunk-Based Development for core services and Git Flow for projects with formal release tracks.

Up next: How to set up CI/CD pipelines for either approach.

CI/CD Pipeline Setup

Git Flow CI/CD Setup

  • Development Branch Pipeline: Runs unit tests, integration tests, code quality checks, build verification, and deployment to the development environment.
  • Release Branch Pipeline: Executes the full test suite, security scans, builds a release candidate, and deploys to the staging environment.
  • Main Branch Pipeline: Conducts validation tests, handles versioning, creates the production build, deploys to production, and tags the release.

Trunk-Based CI/CD Setup

  • Feature Branch Pipeline: Focuses on quick unit tests, code style checks, build verification, and deployment to a preview environment.
  • Main Branch Pipeline: Covers thorough automated testing, security scans, production build creation, progressive deployment, and automated rollback features.

Capgo CI/CD Integration

Capgo

To add live over-the-air updates to either CI/CD setup, Capgo can be integrated seamlessly:

Capgo works with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins to enable live updates, staged rollouts, and instant rollbacks in both Git Flow and Trunk-Based pipelines. It meets Apple and Google requirements while offering support for both cloud and self-hosted deployments [1].

Summary and Recommendations

Choose your workflow based on your team’s size and CI/CD maturity level using the table below:

ScenarioGit FlowTrunk-Based
Team size50+ developersFewer than 50 developers
Release cadenceWeekly or monthlyDaily or multiple times daily
Testing & QATraditional QA cyclesFocus on automated testing
Deployment modelMulti-version, traditionalCloud-native, containerized
Risk toleranceConservative, regulated setupsProgressive, rapid feedback
  • Start with Trunk-Based Development in smaller teams, then expand it to larger groups. Make sure your CI/CD pipeline is fully automated before transitioning.
  • Maintain consistent code reviews and use feature toggles in both workflows. Align your pipeline configurations with the workflow you select.

Some teams might mix these approaches - using Git Flow for major releases while leveraging Trunk-Based Development for feature delivery. Whichever path you take, success depends on integrating CI/CD properly, automating testing, and keeping the team on the same page.

Instant Updates for CapacitorJS Apps

Push updates, fixes, and features instantly to your CapacitorJS apps without app store delays. Experience seamless integration, end-to-end encryption, and real-time updates with Capgo.

Get Started Now

Latest from news

Capgo gives you the best insights you need to create a truly professional mobile app.

blog illustration 2-Way Communication in Capacitor Apps
Development, Mobile, Updates
April 26, 2025

2-Way Communication in Capacitor Apps

Read more
blog illustration 5 Common OTA Update Mistakes to Avoid
Development, Security, Updates
April 13, 2025

5 Common OTA Update Mistakes to Avoid

Read more
blog illustration 5 Security Best Practices for Mobile App Live Updates
Development, Mobile, Updates
January 14, 2025

5 Security Best Practices for Mobile App Live Updates

Read more